Search for: "Merck & Co, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Job applicant holding temporary visa advances negligent misrepresentation claim against Merck
1 May 2020, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
Merck & Co., Inc., April 27, 2020, Pratter, G.). [read post]
WKL&B WOrkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog
Third Boles vs. Merck Fosamax Trial In September 2012 Involves Only The Damages Amount Aspect
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am by Tom Lamb
Merck & Co., Inc., 06 Civ. 9455 (JFK), case is set for a new jury trial on damages before United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
Drug Injury Watch - http://www.drug-injury.com/druginjurycom/
Third Boles vs. Merck Fosamax Trial In September 2012 Involves Only The Damages Amount Aspect
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am by Tom Lamb
Merck & Co., Inc., 06 Civ. 9455 (JFK), case is set for a new jury trial on damages before United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
Drug Injury Watch - http://www.drug-injury.com/druginjurycom/
Reading The Tea Leaves for the Supreme Court’s November and December 2009 Sittings
27 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
United States and Weyhrauch  v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
No State-Law Market For "Fraud On The Market"
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Therasense v. Becton, Dickinson: the death of Rule 56?
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Third Circuit Joins With the Seventh, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits in Holding That Plaintiffs Asserting 1933 Act Claims Need Not Plead Compliance With the Statute of Limitations, Splitting With the First, Eighth and Tenth Circuits
21 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by John Stigi
”  The Court held that the district court failed to apply the discovery standard announced by Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
Corporate Securities Law Blog - http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/
Supreme Court Patent Cases: Post Sale Exhaustion
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Substantive Patent Law: Newly filed petition in Merck & Cie v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
The State-Of-The-Art Defense In Drug/Device Cases After Levine
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
COA Opinion: Michigan’s monetary losses from Medicaid payments for the drug Vioxx constitute “damage to property” bringing the Attorney General’s claim against the drug manufacturer within the products liability statute, which immunizes drug companies fro
19 Mar 2011, 4:48 am by Layla Kuhl
The majority also found the unpublished opinion  Duronio  v  Merck  &  Co,  Inc persuasive. [read post]
One Court of Justice - http://www.ocjblog.com
Will the Supreme Court Weigh in on Reverse Payments in ANDA Cases?
4 Sep 2012, 7:04 am by Todd M. Nosher
As expected, Merck & Co. recently filed its Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, citing this split of circuit authority as the compelling factor favoring a review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
IP Law Alert - http://www.iplawalert.com
New Jersey Law Journal State and Federal Decisions June 4, 2008
5 Jun 2008, 8:41 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library - http://crimlawlib.blogspot.com/
Who Heeds The Heeding Presumption?
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App. 2003); Dole Food Co. v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Second Circuit Clarifies the Use of Legal Presumptions of Consumer Confusion and Injury in Certain Lanham Act Cases
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am by Bruce Colbath
 v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 112 (2d Cir. 2010). [read post]
Antitrust Law Blog - http://www.antitrustlawblog.com/
Second Circuit Clarifies the Use of Legal Presumptions of Consumer Confusion and Injury in Certain Lanham Act Cases
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am by Bruce Colbath
 v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 112 (2d Cir. 2010). [read post]
Ad Briefs: Covering Your Ads - http://www.coveringyourads.com/
Second Circuit Clarifies Standard Regarding Knowledge Of Facts That Constitute A Securities Fraud Violation For Purposes Of Triggering The Two-Year Statute Of Limitations For Rule 10b-5 Claims
16 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
§ 240.10b-5.In doing so, the Second Circuit addressed the gap left by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
Corporate Securities Law Blog - http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/
271(e) Safe Harbor Applies to Unfair Import Investigations Until Infringing Acts are Reasonably Likely to Occur
20 Mar 2008, 8:18 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
I/P Updates - http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/
Wednesday Round-up
2 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
The WSJ Law Blog discusses the “interesting” argument made by Merck during oral argument on Monday in Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Google et al. lose claim construction issue in HBAC case at CAFC
1 Jun 2016, 4:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Merck &Co. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Wall Street Journal covers Brooks Brothers patent marking case
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"They have a very large product line," he says.However, in view of the product lines which have been implicated, the problem of false marking is a bit more complicated:Defendants include companies such as Procter & Gamble, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Cisco Systems, Scientific-Atlanta, Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc., 3M Co., DirecTV, Medtronic Inc. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/