Search for: "Merck & Co, Inc. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant, Civil Action No.: 1:08-cv-4119, is scheduled to start on January 14, 2013 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Merck & Co.,, No. 267003, 2006 WL 1628516, at *3 (Mich. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm
On its own motion, the Court stayed further briefing in this matter pending action by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 06 Civ. 9455 (JFK), case is set for a new jury trial on damages before United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 06 Civ. 9455 (JFK), case is set for a new jury trial on damages before United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
As expected, Merck & Co. recently filed its Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, citing this split of circuit authority as the compelling factor favoring a review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
This long-running litigation involves a challenge by direct purchasers of K-DUR (potassium chloride) Extended-release Tablets who allege that Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
See State Oil Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:04 am
Merck & Co., was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Merck & Co., Inc., 09 Civ. 4282 (JFK), is scheduled for trial on May 7, 2012; and, Spano v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 09 Civ. 4282 (JFK), is scheduled for trial on May 7, 2012; and, Spano v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Merck & Co., 347 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. 2010). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 951 N.E.2d 1238 (Ill. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Merck & Co., 949 A.2d 223, 272 (N.J. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
If a message conveyed by an ad is literally true or ambiguous, the plaintiff must prove actual deception or a tendency to deceive and it may do so with properly conducted consumer evidence (Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharm., Co. v Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharm (1994)). [read post]
