Search for: "Merck & Co, Inc. v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2007, 12:57 am
Merck & Co., Inc., No. 2005-59499, slip op. at 9 (Harris County, Tex. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
”  Summary judgment affirmed.American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:00 am
Supreme Court tightened the constitutional limits on punitive damages, setting aside a $79.5 million award in a smoker case against Altria Group Inc.'s Philip Morris USA unit. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:12 pm
"); see also Merck & Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  This long-running litigation involves a challenge by direct purchasers of K-DUR (potassium chloride) Extended-release Tablets who allege that Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
  The judge also cautioned that the purpose of the declarations in the present proceedings is different to the motivations for the declarations sought in Arrow Generics Limited v Merck & Co. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
- ‘indirect consumer tax’ to fund UN public health initiatives (Afro-IP) Canada: Submissions on Canada-EU trade deal: Canadian Generic Pharma Assoc. wants IP out (Michael Geist) Canada: Intellectual property and agriculture – CDC Triffid seed story (ipblog.ca) EU: Records of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd expert meetings on SPCs (The SPC Blog) EU: Cooperation between Board of Appeal and National Court / acceleration of appeal proceedings: Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (EPLAW)… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The conference, co-chaired by its architects Neil J. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]