Search for: "Merit Elec. v. Federated Dept"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am
Elec. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
Corp. v Federal Ins. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Merit Sys. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:31 am
Corp. v Public Serv. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce, Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY, Filed 15 January 2019).* * * C. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
For example, marijuana—even for medical purposes—is still illegal under Federal law. [read post]