Search for: "Meserve v. State"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 4:46 am
He stated that although [Meserve] had not made any threats that would lead him to fear for his physical safety, he did fear for his safety as a result of her irrational behavior. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
Meserve, President, Carnegie Institution for Science, and former Chairman, U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
