Search for: "Meyer v. Board of Public Works" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
We’re very deferential to the Board, but even so, the NLRB’s reasoning here is ‘too opaque.'” [John Kenneth Ross, Short Circuit, on Oncor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 5:30 am by Emily Chan
As Tenenbaum noted, the Form 990 has evolved from an accounting form read mainly by the IRS to a public relations tool (or nightmare) that is read by not only regulators but also the public, donors, media and even possible adversaries. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog Friends Do NOT Let Friends Engage in Harassing Conduct — via Next Blog Does Your Workplace Need A “Hands Off Pants On” Rule? [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
In fact, my first job after J-school was The Brownsville Herald, where I covered public education, which was ironic because The Herald was then owned by Libertarians who didn’t believe in public education. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
For publication opinions today (7): In Brockmann Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Sir Meyer gave lengthy evidence on his time at the PCC and called it a public service regulator, unlike other representatives who had conceded the commission did not provide a regulatory function. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:47 am by Skylar Hunter
Despite (1) seemingly clear language in the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act excluding police officer issues from the PERB’s jurisdiction and (2) many, many years of understanding the matters were in fact excluded, in 2017 and again in 2019, the board decided the public safety exclusion in Government Code Section 3511 applied only to cases involving police officers, not those filed by police unions. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Erin Miller
  In Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. [read post]