Search for: "Michael C. Smith" Results 481 - 500 of 1,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Louis University Robert Chesney bobbychesney Texas Colleen Chien colleen_chien Santa Clara Luis Chiesa proflchiesa SUNY Buffalo Adam Chilton adamschilton Chicago Andrew Chin chinunc UNC Kenneth Ching kennyching Regent Cyra Akila Choudhury cyrachoudhury Florida International Allison Christians taxpolblog McGill Chester Chuang ChesterChuang Golden Gate Danielle Citron daniellecitron Maryland Bradford Clark profbradclark George Washington Sherman Clark shermanjclark Michigan Brian Clarke… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:32 am by Bill Marler
Hoffa, General President, International Brotherhood of Teamsters #7 Indra Nooyi, Chairman and CEO, PepsiCo #6 Howard Schultz, CEO, Starbucks #5 Michael R. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Louis University Colleen Chien colleen_chien Santa Clara Luis Chiesa proflchiesa SUNY Buffalo Adam Chilton adamschilton Chicago Andrew Chin chinunc UNC Kenneth Ching kennyching Regent Cyra Akila Choudhury cyrachoudhury Florida International Allison Christians taxpolblog McGill Chester Chuang ChesterChuang Golden Gate Danielle Citron daniellecitron Maryland Bradford Clark profbradclark George Washington Sherman Clark shermanjclark Michigan Brian Clarke Bclarke_LawProf Charlotte Donald C. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm by Bridget Crawford
Glenn Cohen CohenProf Harvard Kim Diana Connolly kimdianaconnoll Buffalo Jorge Contreras contreraslegals American Nathan Cortez nathancortez SMU Brenda Cossman BrendaCossman Toronto Bridget Crawford profbcrawford Pace Susan Crawford scrawford Cardozo Dennis Crouch patentlyo Missouri César Cuauhtémoc Garcia Hernandez crimmigration Capital Jason Czarnezki czarnezki Pace Steven M. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Louis, and Michael Sullivan, Range West Consultants LLC, Prescott, Arizona What's Wrong with the Law of Valuation in Eminent Domain: Four Rules to Change - John C. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am by Ben
Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (C-348/13) where the Court held that that framing content - here  copyright protected videos - is not a copyright infringement, even if the framing occurred without the permission of the copyright owner because it is not a “communication to the public” within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the Copyright Directive (2001/29/EC)But time was against us, and whilst this is not a criticism of the seminar or indeed the speakers, to this… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
(Declaration of Michael Baryla ISO Mot. for Preliminary Injunction (“Baryla Decl. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The two cases in which the Court announced this principle are Smith v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 am
  As the court explained, in this sort of political context, “[c]oercion of a lawful act by a threat of lawful action is protected free expression. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:40 am
Athearn, supra (quoting Georgia Code § 9-11-56(c)). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith. 22 Journal of Law & Policy 483-766 (2014). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
Louis, and Michael Sullivan, Range West Consultants LLC, Prescott, Arizona What’s Wrong with the Law of Valuation in Eminent Domain: Four Rules to Change - John C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Prison officials accused 54-year-old inmate Michael Anthony Kerr of flooding his cell, according to an autopsy released in September. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
* Copyright exceptions and user rights in Case C-117/13 Ulmer: a couple of observationsLast week this blog reported on the latest addition to the copyright collection of the CJEU, this being the decision in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG, where the CJEU ruled that Article 5(3)(n) of the InfoSoc Directive, read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c) of the same directive, must be interpreted as allowing [read post]