Search for: "Michael Campbell"
Results 41 - 60
of 856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Through the leadership of scholar-lawyer Michael Rebell, there has been an impressive recent effort to recognize a right to civic education under the US Constitution that would include: a meaningful opportunity to obtain a basic education necessary to prepare them to be capable voters and jurors, to exercise effectively their right of free speech and other constitutional rights, to participate effectively and intelligently in our open political system and to function productively as… [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 June 2023, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:24 am
” Daniel Michaels reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
The Proof of Waiver was uploaded by Michael Flores, but it is locked. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
by Michael C. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
They point to the 1994 Supreme Court case of Campbell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Student Loan Case Could Redefine Limits of Presidential Power DNyuz – Michael Shear and Adam Liptak (New York Times) | Published: 3/1/2023 One of President Biden’s most ambitious proposals, a $400 billion program to forgive student loan debt for 40 million Americans, could become the latest victim of a legal tug of war with the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm
Nebraska, James Campbell, arguing on behalf of several states, claimed, “The Secretary is attempting to bypass Congress on one of today’s most debated policy questions, student loan forgiveness. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
James Campbell argues for the states challenging the program. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Tucker did not disclose in either his report or CV that he is a founding member of the Veterans Advisory Council to Michael Bloomberg's gun-control advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 June 2023, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, registration now open, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
Jud Campbell (Univ. of Richmond), and Prof. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
Civil Litigation, Plaintiff Olivia Keller, Medical Malpractice, Employment & General Litigation Ryan McLane, Civil Litigation, Defense Michael J. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
And, as I've written before, relying on the work of Jud Campbell and others, that idea simply has no weight or history behind it. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Oath Keepers’ Rhodes Guilty of Jan. 6 Seditious Conspiracy MSN – Lindsay Whitehurst, Alana Durkin Richer, and Michael Kunzelman (Associated Press) | Published: 11/29/2022 Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes was convicted of seditious conspiracy for a violent plot to overturn President Biden’s election, handing the Justice Department a major victory in its prosecution of the Capitol insurrection. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Sternlight, Michael and Sonja Saltman Professor of Law and Director of the Saltman Center for Conflict Resolution at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Michael CarusoAs David's loyal readers know, this is a momentous year for the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
As Jud Campbell has explained, antebellum Americans recognized “a common set of rights, applicable against the state and federal governments alike,” but they thought those rights were “regulable” by a state’s police power; therefore, this recognition of a common set of rights “did not necessarily mean that those rights had the same legal boundaries. [read post]
