Search for: "Michael D. Proctor" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 9:56 am by Chris Dreyer
The E-Myth Attorney by Michael Gerber While the concepts in this book are relatively simple, they are also powerful. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
  The Dot was built to house the workers of Armour Meats, Sunshine Biscuits, General Motors, Proctor & Gamble and other manufacturing companies' workforces. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents R&D spending stalls, but the US and EU continue to lead the way (IAM) IBIL seminar provides platform for judges to address concerns about the patent system (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) (IPKat) Funding patent litigation – after-the-event insurance (ATE) and third party funding (TPF) really work? [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
I’d probably offer excerpts from all of the different opinions in that case to offer the students a comprehensive view of where things sit today. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Michael Clemmer, a consumer of ATM services, argues that the notice must explicitly state that a consumer "is" or "will be" (or some variant thereof) charged a fee. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
— Cathy Proctor, Denver Business Journal, March 18, 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE:    DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY    Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]