Search for: "Michael R. Brown, US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
In the same year, the Selikoffs were living at 965 Fifth Avenue, near 78th Street, in Manhattan.[27] 1950. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
In the same year, the Selikoffs were living at 965 Fifth Avenue, near 78th Street, in Manhattan.23 By the early 1950s, Selikoff and his wife had moved to 505 Upper Boulevard, Ridgewood, New Jersey. 1950. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The latest appellate nominees are Andy Oldham (Fifth Circuit), Michael Scudder (Seventh Circuit), Amy St. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
But the plaintiffs also alleged that EO 13769 violates the First and Fifth Amendments because it discriminates against Muslims.While the Ninth Circuit did not directly address the merits of the discrimination claims, it suggested that they too have merit. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that, because these challengers had already brought a facial challenge to the provisions, their new, as-applied challenge was barred by principles of res judicata. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
  Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit ordered new trial because of juror misconduct. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm by Law Lady
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Docket: 14-10228, Docket: 15-10045           Opinion Date: September 25, 2015Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional LawAfter Ryan Cole, a seventeen-year-old, was severely injured in an armed encounter with police, he and his parents filed suit against the officers for, among other things, use of excessive force in violation of Ryan's Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
This is the fifth and last post in a series on The Modest Effect of Minneci v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Brown, 389 So. 2d 48, 51 (La. 1980) (concluding drug possession cannot be a strict liability crime because it would impermissibly criminalize unknowing possession of a controlled substance and permit a person to be convicted “without ever being aware of the nature of the substance he was given. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
(A similar case from Texas is pending in the Fifth Circuit.) [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Third, there's the Ninth Circuit opinion of March 19, 2010, which is the opinion being appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Fifth and Eleventh Circuits ruled that Hall Street ended “manifest disregard,” but the Second, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits still treat it as part of the FAA. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Appointed by President Gerald R. [read post]