Search for: "Michael Risch"
Results 61 - 80
of 187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 1:13 pm
Colleen Chien, Santa Clara University Law School and Michael Risch, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law[1] Today, the Federal Circuit heard oral argument in the mandamus petition brought in the TC Heartland case. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:49 am
He argues that "its current diluted interpretation (anything that does anything likely has substantial utility) may stem from its separation from the underlying art," and that courts should recognize that utility is, in my co-blogger Michael Risch's words, "A Surprisingly Useful Requirement. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:13 pm
:Michael Martin states that Prof. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 10:24 am
James Risch (R-ID), Sen. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:05 am
NYU law Patently-O Patently-O Patently-O The Legal Intelligence Prof Michael Risch on Written Description = = = = = The history of the issues here have gone back-and-forth. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:37 pm
Michael Risch alludes to this problem in his blog post on Williamson when he asked “[H]ow much structure is enough? [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:37 pm
Guests: Irina Manta and Michael Risch Photo credit: Kyle Nishioka Download or subscribe to this show at twit.tv/twil. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:28 am
To discuss the case, we have Michael Risch, who is a Professor of Law at the Villanova University School of Law. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:43 am
Michael Risch, Do We Need a Federal Trade Secret Statute? [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Guest post by Michael Risch, Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:49 am
Matteo (Tsinghua); Michael Mazzeo (Northwestern Management); Adam Mossoff (George Mason); Sean O’Connor (UW); Kristen Osenga (Richmond); Jorge Padilla (Lexecon); Lee Petherbridge (Loyola); Michael Risch (Villanova); Mark Schultz (SIU); David L. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:57 am
Michael Risch previously posted on the study by Paul Heald, Kris Erickson, and Martin Kretschmer on the value of public domain photographs on Wikipedia. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:02 pm
Michael Risch: I think a growing hostility toward IP rights among the general public has been the biggest change in the last 10 years, though it may have started earlier with peer-to-peer music sharing and people unhappy with over-the-top enforcement by the music industry. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:13 am
Michael Risch: I think the rise of media-style blogs has been the biggest change; it is hard to tell the difference between a blog and an op-ed site sometimes. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:05 am
Michael Risch: I find the blog useful for keeping up with current cases in the areas you cover. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:24 pm
For a link to Yackee's article see the earlier post on this blog by Michael Risch. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Washington Jennifer Camero ProfessorCamero Southern Illinois Montre Carodine MDCarodine Alabama Paul Caron SoCalTaxProf Pepperdine Michael Carrier profmikecarrier Rutgers Arturo Carrillo AJCarrillo4 George Washington Elizabeth Carter BitsyNOLA Louisiana State Melissa Casan MsCastan Monash David Case dwcase Mississippi Mary Anne Case Mary_Anne_Case Chicago Tim Caulfield CaulfieldTim Alberta James Cavallaro JimCavallaro Stanford Eric Chaffee… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Louis University Victor Fleischer vcfleischer San Diego John Flood JohnAFlood Univ College Dublin Sutherland David Fontana proffontana George Washington Pamela Foohey PamelaFoohey Indiana-Maurer Sheila Foster SheilaRFoster Fordham Cynthia Fountaine clfountaine Southern Illinois Gary Francione garylfrancione Rutgers-Newark Rosa Freedman GoonerDr Univ Birmingham (UK) Barry Friedman barryfriedman1 NYU Brett Frischmann BrettFrischmann Cardozo Jeanne Fromer JeanneFromer NYU Michael Froomkin… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
Michael Risch, Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
Court limited deference http://t.co/sPxsGwnknL— Michael Risch (@ProfRisch) January 20, 2015 Teva likely not to change very much unless district courts start holding evidentiary hearings just to insulate themselves from review. [read post]
