Search for: "Michael v. Virginia Department of Transportation"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2012, 4:58 am
According to this opinion, it began in May of 2009, when Detective Nicholas Rudman of the Charlottesville (Virginia) Police Department, who was assigned to investigate internet crimes against children, began an investigation of an internet protocol (`IP’) address associated with a computer that had downloaded files containing child pornography. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
”And one of my new favorites:In Pappas v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
Virginia. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
ACLU, Police Clash Over Cellphone Location Data – Threat Level The Aftermath of the U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
”And one of my new favorites:In Pappas v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
This summer, we secured a favorable appeal in Simpkins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
This summer, we secured a favorable appeal in Simpkins v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
Michael M. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
Michael Stevens at the Kentucky Law Review does a great round up of posts and materials on Medicaid subrogation in light of Alhorn v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Department of Agriculture, 796 F.3d 445 [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 6:14 am
Code § 2252(a)(4)(B) and transportation of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Major Transportation Services, Inc., a California Corporation, Baljinder S. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
The Court’s session opens promptly at 10, and Justice Antonin Scalia delivers the opinion in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
Virginia. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
After a public hearing and several internal votes, the Texas Department of Transportation rejected the application under a provision of state law authorizing the rejection of “a new specialty license plate if the design might be offensive to any member of the public. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
First, the Western District of Virginia denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss in Hoofnagle v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
