Search for: "Michaels Enterprises, Inc. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Danny Garber, Michael Manis, Kenneth Yellin, Jordan Feinstein, Aluma Holdings LLC, Azure Trading LLC, Coastal Group Holdings, Inc., Greyhawk Equities LLC, Leonidas Group Holdings LLC, The Leonidas Group LLC, Nismic Sales Corp., The OGP Group LLC, Perlinda Enterprises LLC, Rio Sterling Holdings LLC, Slow Train Holdings LLC, and Spartan Group Holdings LLC Case number: 12-cv-09339 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:13 am by Michael Reiter
Often referred to as the “police power,” this constitutional authority of counties and cities to adopt local ordinances was described by the Supreme Court in Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:13 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
Often referred to as the “police power,” this constitutional authority of counties and cities to adopt local ordinances was described by the Supreme Court in Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Fisher, The Good Life Financial Group, Inc., and The Good Life Global Enterprises, LLCCase number: 13-cv-00683 (United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin)Case filed: September 30, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: October 16, 2013 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-24 SEC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm by Schachtman
  In 2004, after several years of lobbying, agents of the litigation industry managed to push a policy statement past the Association’s leadership, to condemn the requirement of evidence-based reasoning in federal courts in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am by Eugene Volokh
The Act is therefore far more like the ordinance in Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by Amber Walsh
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]