Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
Laitram Corp, 406 U.S. 518 (1972) and Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:32 am
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, a thought leader on FRAND since his landmark Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
Cir. 2014), Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am
But that doesn't have to prevent the parties from engaging in constructive dialog, or multilateral talks that would also involve the United States and the United Kingdom.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
The following piece is adapted from my newly-released eCasebook “Cybersecurity Law, Policy, and Institutions” (v.3.1), which is available free and in full (270+ pages) in pdf format here. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 10:00 am
”); Two-Way Media LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 12:13 pm
Microsoft Corp., 822 F.3d 1327, 1335 (Fed. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:36 am
Again, I wasn't initially sold, but I watched the further developments with an open mind and less than a year later I think--in light of the recent announcement by three United States Senators--that the CAF may go down in history as one of the most impactful and important policy efforts in the history of the tech industry.The tide has turned. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
The Court rejects the argument advanced by the United States, as amicus, that this amounted to “informational injury” that was sufficient to confer standing. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 10:15 am
See Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:47 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:04 am
I know everybody says that and I know the sense in which it is meant, but the dear colleague letter was not in fact a statute of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
It must be signed by the Federal President, but unlike the President of the United States, he merely notarizes laws unless they raise clear constitutional issues, which won't be the case here.In this new phase, my focus is not on what I believe went wrong last time, but on what exactly the courts and the lawyers make of it. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm
In June 2020, IBM, Microsoft, and Amazon paused these sales. [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am
Epic is on the winning track with respect to liability as Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California laid bare the bankruptcy of Apple's defenses. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
You can click on any of the links below to go straight to the part you're most interested in:Effective App Store commission ("App Store tax") rate peaks at 35.25% (plus annual developer program fee plus Search Ads) -- a relative increase by 17.5%IP-related issues surrounding web appsRecent United States Senate hearing: mixed blessing for Epic's caseStatement of Objections from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) in the… [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
