Search for: "Mike Rappaport"
Results 341 - 360
of 369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 6:09 pm
Similarly, Mike Rappaport and John McGinnis defended “the Senate’s long practice of requiring a supermajority to end debate on legislation,” on the grounds that: If the Senate voted on whether to change the cloture rule, only a simple majority would be needed to change it. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm
UPDATE: Bonus from the same (Law and Liberty blog): Mike Rappaport takes on Posner’s claim that the original meaning of “freedom of speech” in the First Amendment did not include symbolic speech like flagburning, citing our own Eugene Volokh. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
There are plausible arguments available to them, as Mike Rappaport has recently shown, but they haven't talked about them much. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:18 am
At Liberty Fund’s newly launched Library of Law and Liberty, lawprof/blogger Mike Rappaport after listening to my interview resolved to put the book on his reading list, having not previously appreciated how central the role of the Ford Foundation has been in influencing the schools’ development. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:22 pm
Both are examples within the third category. https://t.co/7GJkcRvr2c — Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) May 5, 2021 Here's another libertarian with a similar take: https://t.co/127eVKyfqw — Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) May 5, 2021 Update: Professor Mike Rappaport wrote a relevant essay in January, titled Can a Classical Liberal Support Big Tech Regulation? [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, December 22, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of December 15-21, 2023 Investor Alliances: The Infrastructure For Climate Stewardship Posted by Amelia Miazad (University of California at Davis), on Friday, December 15, 2023 Tags: Climate change, climate risk, ESG, investor stewardship, investors Securities and Derivative Litigation: Quarterly… [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:22 am
Professor Mike Rappaport points out that “[i]f Reno was correct, then this suggests that the President could change the regulation rather quickly. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
And Mike Rappaport offered some thoughts about when governors have to sign constitutional amendments. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:27 pm
UPDATE #2: Mike Rappaport has posted a thoughtful response to Sandy’s post here. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:44 am
Same-sex marriage might be a better area for Eric, but Mike Rappaport and Mike Ramsey — who are core originalists if anybody is — both think it is quite plausible that the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment protects a right to gay marriage. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 10:23 am
Rappaport's statements and Hirsch's are VERY different.I see absolutely no reason to think that Milt should not be a Judge. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:52 am
(Here is Mike Rappaport on a range of historical definitions, here is a discussion of Ronald Reagan’s California pension, here is a discussion of President Obama’s treasury bonds — and we’re just getting started.) 4. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:44 am
Hat Tip, Mike Rappaport. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
(Here are two posts (1, 2) by Mike Rappaport discussing the problem.) [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
Mike Rappaport thinks that I am clearly wrong, while Eric Posner seems to believe Treasury can act, especially in a world of Chevron deference. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:44 am
" As Mike Rappaport and I have argued, it is constitutional for judges to follow Court precedent rather than original meaning. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:44 am
Anyway . . . for more, here is Larry Solum; here is Stephen Schwinn; here is (Jim's sometime collaborator) Doug Kendall; and here is Mike Rappaport. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
In contrast, Mike Rappaport and I believe that the expected applications are often good evidence—sometimes the best evidence—of what the text actually meant....Thomas clearly embraces expected applications.I don't think this really captures Balkin's position but it does accurately state the opposition to strong reliance on expected applications by most New Originalists, including Professor Larry Solum. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:43 pm
But I agree with Mike Rappaport: "Justice Kavanaugh's originalism is by no means proven. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
Eggers, the Center’s executive director, Mike Turley, Global Public Sector Leader at Deloitte, and Pankaj Kishnani, a researcher with the Center, discussed issues for regulating emerging technologies. [read post]
