Search for: "Miles v. District of Columbia"
Results 21 - 40
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
As you recall, in December, a federal district court enjoined most of HB 20, Texas’ so-called “social media censorship” law. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
They gave Congress authority to “exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever” over the District, stating only that it could not be larger than ten square miles. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
My buddies Phil Miles (here) and Jon Hyman (here) blogged about Judge Kavanaugh’s 2013 concurrence in a race-discrimination case called Ayissi-Etoh v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
My buddies Phil Miles (here) and Jon Hyman (here) blogged about Judge Kavanaugh’s 2013 concurrence in a race-discrimination case called Ayissi-Etoh v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:23 am
The salmon hatch out of eggs laid in freshwater rivers and streams, then migrate often hundreds of miles to the ocean, where they live for years before returning to their natal streams to spawn and to die. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:04 pm
Several groups. individuals, cities, and counties who petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review the FAA's decision to move forward with its redesign of the New York/New Jersey/Pennsylvania airspace have filed Petitions for Rehearing after the rather surprising D.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 12:42 pm
In Steiner v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
I'm sure the district attorney's office is burning the midnight oil to find some daylight in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:01 am
James would give up sailing 4 years later on account of seasickness.... 1953 (55 years ago today), in the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:36 am
US v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
On July 6, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
In Dean, Milwaukee dairies challenged the city of Madison's law prohibiting the sale of milk produced more than five miles from the center of the city.Indeed, it was our old friend the Interstate Commerce Clause that was relied upon in the 1941 case of Edwards v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:22 pm
Although Drudge lives and writes his column in California, a court ruled that he was subject to personal jurisdiction in the District of Columbia because the injury occurred in the District of Columbia and Drudge had the following contacts with the state: Drudge personally emailed his column to a list of District of Columbia email addresses; Drudge solicited contributions and collected money from District of Columbia… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:14 am
Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a requirement that the… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:14 pm
Suko, a federal district court judge sitting in the Eastern District of Washington, ruled on April 4, 2012, that PRP Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. failed to prove that contamination at a CERCLA site was divisible and, as a result, will be subject to CERCLA 107 joint and several liability at an upcoming September 2012 bench trial (Pakootas v. [read post]
