Search for: "Miles v. Wells" Results 61 - 80 of 2,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 3:21 pm
You can take police on a high-speed chase on the 101 for 45 minutes at speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:51 am by Myers Freelance
The post Competitive Keyword Ads Go to Court: Edible Arrangements v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”The Appellate Division noted that there was a significant difference between the posted speed limit, which was 40 miles per hour, and the 70 miles per hour at which the police witness visually estimated the speed of Faisal’s vehicle, an estimation that was promptly confirmed by a radar indication that the actual speed was 71 miles per hour.In the present action Faisal raised certain evidentiary objections that the court said were not raised at the… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
The wells themselves are located over an area of approximately forty-three square miles at varying distances from the plant -- from five hundred feet to eight miles away -- and Summit does not own the property between the individual well sites or the property between the wells and the plant. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
Historical Background The British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”), a dependency of Mauritius until it was ceded to the UK by France in 1814, is situated about 2200 miles east of the coast of Africa and 1000 miles south-west of the southern tip of India. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
Judge Davis based the majority opinion on the Jones Act and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miles v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
A rare Rent Act 1977 possession case, with possession sought as 'reasonably required' under Case 9 Of Schedule 15 of the 1977 Act via section 98(1).Miles v Law [2012] EWCA Civ 1756 [Transcript on Lexis. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
A rare Rent Act 1977 possession case, with possession sought as 'reasonably required' under Case 9 Of Schedule 15 of the 1977 Act via section 98(1).Miles v Law [2012] EWCA Civ 1756 [Transcript on Lexis. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 10:25 am
This tradition carried along until 1990 when the Supreme Court issued its opinion of Miles v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Dan Hoerner
The latest McBride ruling is in keeping with the general pronouncement of the Supreme Court’s Miles v. [read post]