Search for: "Miller v. Argus Publishing Co." Results 41 - 60 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The real reason the nonprecedential nature of the Seventh Circuit opinion here did not argue against Supreme Court review is that the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in Manuel was nonprecedential only because there was an earlier, fully precedential, published opinion in the Seventh Circuit—Newsome v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
  It refers to Buttars and Millers as “Defendants. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Graphic via End the LieIn the wee hours of the morning, long after the 101st co-author had signed on to HB 1608, prosecutors and police argued to the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee, as they had to the Senate Criminal Justice Committee that afternoon, that they should not be required to get a warrant for cell-phone users' historical location data. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  In 1958 alone, five works were published under his name, and then in 1960 and 1961 he published four different books for each of those respective years. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Miller, New York City, for petitioners. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
In this Article, we argue that this confusion is largely unnecessary. [read post]