Search for: "Miller v. California" Results 121 - 140 of 1,657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2022, 3:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Joseph Peacock
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:58 pm by Brian Frye
Other than child pornography, almost anything goes, even though Miller v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
In what one of our colleagues called a "billion dollar roll of the dice," review was granted in Miller v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:18 am
"Last week, on similar facts, the Sixth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by Bryan W. Wenter and Ronny Clausner
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under the provisional lines Draper proposes, of the 12 Senators who would come from the six Californias, we could expect four (from Silicon Valley and West California) to consistently be Democrats, and four (from Jefferson and Central California) to lean Republican, with the other four (from Northern California and South California) harder to predict. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:41 am
Chris Miller, an excellent former student of mine, has pointed out Woods v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 8:35 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 30851 (WD NC, Feb. 26, 2019), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was denied daily devotionals and religious materials from various ministries.In Miller v. [read post]