Search for: "Miller v. King"
Results 61 - 80
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
’ He said he was glad of it and shook me by the hand and bade me farewell, and said he would die in a few minutes” (Drayton, v. 2, p. 370). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
(Citing County of Amador v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
(Monterey Coastkeeper v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
(Citing, e.g., Rich v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:59 pm
Hughs and Miller v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
See Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
A complicating element in the case is Evon Miller, Mormon-born FBI agent in deep undercover, who is assigned to watch Feaver and finds herself, against her better inclinations, drawn to him–for Feaver is a character of almost Shakespearean contradictions. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
The case of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland dealt with whether the advice given by the UK Prime Minister to Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament (that is, discontinue its session) for a number of days between September and October 2019 was lawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm
MILLER,FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1083 (4th ed. 2019)(noting that “[t]he general attitude of the federal courts isthat the provisions of Federal Rule 4 should be liberallyconstrued”); King v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 11:10 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Carnival Cruise Lines, Case No. 19-cv-21725-KING (S.D. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
In Precision Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the judges in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union therefore erred when concluding that the triggering of Article 50 “is a bullet that cannot be withdrawn. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am
I’m just the king of a kingdom that doesn’t brew beer with corn syrup. [read post]
