Search for: "Miller v. King (1993)"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 7:20 am
Co. v Johnson(Sup. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Mass. 2009); Miller v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Super. 2006).Tennessee: King v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
King-Washington v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
“This is the precise bullet that the trial court correctly dodged in Miller v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
App. 1993).HawaiiCraft v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). 2128. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
[9] See, e.g., Geoffrey Sawer, Modern Federalism 1 –2 (1969); Ivo Duchacek, Comparative Federalism 207 –08 (1970); Preston King, Federalism and Federation 60 (! [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Daly, 120 Wash.2d 782, 845 P.2d 995 (Washington Supreme Court 1993). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
Miller, and W. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Collins,985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993)); Barksdale v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
