Search for: "Miller v. Miller (1970)" Results 21 - 40 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 6:16 pm by Hayley Tsukayama
Although the Supreme Court upheld the 1970s regulations in an as-applied challenge, Justice Powell, who authored Miller, was skeptical that more intrusive rules would pass constitutional muster. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:45 pm by José Guillermo
Véase también el “dossier de prensa” en la sección “la institución” de la página web de Agenda: PERÚ. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm by kwalters
  *Mary Ziegler is the Stearns Weaver Miller Professor at Florida State University College of Law and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939), held that issues concerning how the Constitution is amended are “political questions” into which the courts may not intervene. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
New York’s 1956 regulations, like the federal regulations that would follow in the early 1970s, focused on avoiding exposure to hazardous substances such as crystalline silica in the first instance. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
A complicating element in the case is Evon Miller, Mormon-born FBI agent in deep undercover, who is assigned to watch Feaver and finds herself, against her better inclinations, drawn to him–for Feaver is a character of almost Shakespearean contradictions. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The EPC has no explicit provision preventing double patenting by the same applicant of the same invention; not by two applications filed on the same date but not connected via priority or otherwise, not by two applications filed on different dates but linked by priority (so having the same effective date but different filing date), not by by two applications filed on different dates but with the same filing date (i.e., a parent and a divisional). [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The NPR story notes that Syed, who was 17 years old at the time of the murder, intends to litigate a Miller v. [read post]