Search for: "Miller v. Office of Personnel Management"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:39 pm
Thus, in Miller v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Although I am not a Jew, I am, following Jonathan Miller, “Jew-ish, just not the whole hog. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Department of Defense amend regulations restricting lobbying by former personnel. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:34 pm
Recent cases such as League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain Area Preservation Foundation v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:22 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
John Nowell, Jr., the chief of naval personnel; Lt. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
§ 145 includes personnel expenses incurred by the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:31 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Indiana, 17-1511 Issues: (1) Whether Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Although I am not a Jew, I am, following Jonathan Miller, “Jew-ish, just not the whole hog. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Aaron David Miller will moderate the discussion. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
Rose, Jim Miller, Elaine Kamarck and Maya MacGuineas will be on the panel. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals fo the 11th Circuit’s rule that reasonable jurists could not debate an issue foreclosed by binding circuit precedent, even when a judge on the panel issued the binding precedent and subsequently stated that the panel’s decision may be erroneous, misapplies the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s holding—granting qualified immunity to law-enforcement officers who stopped the petitioner from praying silently in her own home because there was no prior case law involving similar facts—conflicts with Hope v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
PARK, DRUMMOND WOODSUM.TURNSTILE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, Defendant, represented by BRIAN D. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:20 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
