Search for: "Miller v. Office of Personnel Management"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM), in calculating Grover’s pay, did not include anything close to $17,500 in overtime pay, although Grover asserted that he received more than $17,500 in overtime pay in those years. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
(Miller v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:17 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
It is not, formally or informally, bound by the weather decisions made for the executive branch by the Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
At all relevant times, defendant Kenneth Nassif, a Virginia resident, served as the Managing Director of Alliance.Plaintiff commenced his employment with Alliance in April 2014. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:46 am
Additionally, training for newly hired personnel was conducted at the office site. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:27 pm
., and Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:28 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Personnel continuity. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
Defendants were not there, and the employee proceeded to enter the apartment without confirming whether office personnel were able to contact Defendants. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
This indeterminate-sentencing system was supplemented by the utilization of parole, by which an offender was returned to society under the "guidance and control" of a parole officer. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
He argued that the Office of Personnel Management issued a regulation that makes members of Congress and their staffs eligible for employer-subsidized health insurance, but this regulation directly contradicts a provision of the ACA that requires that members of Congress and their staffs purchase their insurance on the individual exchanges set up under the ACA. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:25 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
There are several ontologies related to law that could inform the project and that could also potentially be mapped. [12] Systems to be consulted (and mapped) could include ontologies designed for primary law and local knowledge management in legal settings, as well as ontologies in subject areas outside the law. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 8:02 pm
Geenen v. [read post]
