Search for: "Miller v. Secretary of Health*"
Results 81 - 100
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
” Data Privacy and Data Protection The Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment in R (Open Rights Group and the3million) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others [2021] EWCA Civ 800 concluding that the ‘immigration exemption’ in Schedule 2 to the DPA 2018 is not compliant with the GDPR. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Agri Processor v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am
A statement of the principle was set out in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
Civil Rights Organisation, Liberty, has been granted permission by the High Court to take legal action against Home Secretary Suella Braverman’s decision to pass anti-protest legislation which was previously rejected by Parliament through the use of a statutory instrument. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Joseph Votel (January 29, 2024) The Just Security Podcast: ICJ Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
On 10 March 2023 there was a contempt application in the case of Miller -v- Peake QB-2022-001106. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm
Placerville Historic Preservation League v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm
City of Los Angeles etc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
(See Fairbank v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The assumption of stochastic risk is, as Judge Weinstein recognized in Agent Orange, often the only assumption on which plaintiffs will ever have a basis for claiming individual causation on typical datasets available to support health effects claims. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
” Mark Esper, Trump’s former defense secretary, has warned of “more … hyper-aggressive behavior” by Trump if he takes office, recounting when Trump asked if demonstrators gathering around the White House following the death of George Floyd could be shot. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
"Miller-El v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
