Search for: "Mills v. Rogers"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
Disappointingly, the Court sidestepped the larger issue of when and how a speech-protective test like Rogers v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am
A few days after the vote, Roger Milliken held a board meeting to liquidate the Darlington mill for economic reasons. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
A final note about this case: Christopher Mills, counsel for Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:36 am
Roger Anderson was a licensed physician in Marietta, Ohio, who was authorized to prescribe controlled substances. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: It’s Not Rocket Science, But It’s Still a Matter of Agency Expertise
27 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Godwin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
" What John Stuart Mill once observed about [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Jeffords v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
The Genetic Literacy Project (GLP) asks: “Who is David and who is Goliath in the lobbying battle over agricultural biotechnology? [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
In 2013, Roger Butler was working at an International Paper mill in Dequincy, Louisiana. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
Afterlife Network Inc., 2019 FC 545 Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Roger Pilon praises Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch for urging reliance on the privileges and immunities clause rather than the due process clause in Timbs v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
… Major Philosophers rarely or never cited Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Protagoras, Epicurus, Zeno of Citium, Plotinus, Epictetus, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Avicenna, Averroes, Roger Bacon, John Calvin, Baruch Spinoza, George Berkeley, Henri Bergson, Alfred North Whitehead and Søren Kierkegaard, all named in that earlier list of major philosophers, fill that bill. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Therefore, the court concluded that Part I was excluded (Para 20).In Roger Shashoua (2017) 14 SCC 722, the Supreme Court held that where the parties had chosen a venue and there was something else the court has to determine whether these can be interpreted to mean a choice of juridical seat. [read post]
