Search for: "Mince v. Mince"
Results 81 - 100
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:14 am
Given especially that Elting was granted a TRO, the payroll access misstatements, which we have determined to be immaterial, “were not sufficiently egregious to support this claim” of § 487 violation (Mintz v Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP, 53 Misc 3d 132{A} [App Term 1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
Quoting the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
In Encino Motorcars LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm
orman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
In his unusually pointed remarks, Chairman Clayton did not mince words, stating: “Market professionals, especially gatekeepers, need to act responsibly and hold themselves to high standards. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 3:29 pm
This case, captioned Alfrida Rodriguez, Michael Sanchez and David Velez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court decided a case, Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 2:13 pm
HoganLovells generously hosted the event (and their mulled wine and mince pies were especially appreciated). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm
Judge Janice Brown, never one to mince words, dissents. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Article V, which permits amendment, exists because the Framers were persuaded that the powerful would find ways to circumvent the limits that were built in. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:06 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
” He was uninterested in mincing words: “These ideas are asinine. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:19 am
The Court’s decision in Starry Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:06 am
Indeed, one case that Minc cited, King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
The Board minced no words in explaining the reduction: The main reason for that decrease is the fact that as a result of the decision of the Supreme Court in Alberta v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Guido Kucsko also cautioned that OTK v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
Unsurprisingly, President Trump’s Executive Order suspending immigrant and refugee entry to the US has set off a firestorm of high-profile reactions. [read post]
