Search for: "Minor v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 16,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech and struck a blow against government censorship-by-proxy yesterday in NRA v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
Without representation from an attorney, Granier filed his own petition for review from the state prison in Angola, Louisiana, arguing, in Granier v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:18 am by Felix Le Roux
The case is Prosec Guards CC v Department of Public Works and Infrastructure and Others (2501/23; 2502/23) [2024] ZAWCHC 139 (24 May 2024). [read post]
29 May 2024, 2:09 pm by NARF
Jennifer Odegard (Indian Child Welfare Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html In re JCR II/JCR/JCR/JCR, Minors (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
The state court in that case explained that in 1970, in Williams v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
To take an example that echoes his recent attack on Judge Merchan, in 2019 he said that a group of four minority congresswomen should “go back” to the countries they came from rather than “loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States” how to run the government.Here again, Trump is playing to a receptive audience.In recent years Congress has passed many fewer laws than it did decades ago. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
“[I]nferring bad faith based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated” would, Alito suggested, allow litigants and courts to circumvent the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]