Search for: "Mintz v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 11:59 am
Guest Blogger Marshall Mintz provides his take below of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Mintz v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 am
The outcome of Mintz v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am
Justice Ling-Cohan writes a basic textbook of how an account stated case is decided in an attorney fee setting in Mintz & Fraade, P.C. v Docuport, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
The case of Mintz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) similarly requires... [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Corp. v State of New York, 14 AD3d 817,818 [3d Dept 2005]). [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
Marcus and Neil Mintz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:45 pm
Today the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
By Marcus Mintz In a recent case filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Mainline Information Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
The Federal Circuit has repeatedly confirmed that secondary consideration evidence is an integral part of an obviousness analysis (indeed, it “may be the most pertinent, probative, and revealing evidence available to the decision maker in reaching a conclusion on the obviousness/nonobviousness issue”) and thus has mandated consideration of such evidence in assessing obviousness (Mintz v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:08 pm
See Paramount Termite Control Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:18 am
” This distinction is at issue in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:26 am
On May 4, the Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as a High Court of Justice (HCJ), issued its long-awaited judgment in Abu Aram v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm
Howard Mintz has this story in the San Jose Mercury-News. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, observed the Appellate Division, "plaintiffs in retaliation cases are held to a lenient pleading standard and are generally afforded deference at the pleading stage, citing Thomas v Mintz, 182 AD3d 490 and Petit v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 177 AD3d 402. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, observed the Appellate Division, "plaintiffs in retaliation cases are held to a lenient pleading standard and are generally afforded deference at the pleading stage, citing Thomas v Mintz, 182 AD3d 490 and Petit v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 177 AD3d 402. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 5:22 am
Willis The CFPB has filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiff in Arias v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides free access to the Brief for Appellant in United States v. [read post]
