Search for: "Mitchell v. State of Texas (two Cases)" Results 81 - 100 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
Case Study: Beckman v Match.com The case in question–and the reason I wanted to write about this–involves Mary Kay Beckman, a 46-year-old Match.com user who was paired with suitor Wade Mitchell Ridley, 50, through the site. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There was hardly an expenditure for the benefit of religious entities that struck them as concerning, as seen in their plurality in Mitchell v. [read post]
In this case, there was police action: the two boys have been hit with felony charges. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in two cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm by Ronald Mann
  Two years ago, the Court heard arguments in Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Jessica Smith
The only contrary authority that I found in the published case law is one Texas decision, that creates a split among sister courts on the issue. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Had the Marshalls read these two documents together, they would have discovered that BP was not conducting good-faith continuous operations. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Kleinberger (pictured), Emeritus Professor of Law at William Mitchell College of Law in St. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
As Richard Nixon’s HUD secretary and attorney general, they brought the case that persuaded the Eighth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
” Peter Lee, “Patent Law and the Two Cultures,” 120 Yale L.J. 2, 4 (2010); see also Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
  The citation to Wells was clearly wrong in that the plaintiffs in that case had, in fact, relied upon studies that were nominally statistically significant, and so the Wells court could not have held that statistical significance was unnecessary.[1] The two other cases cited by the Supreme Court, however, were both about “differential diagnosis,” and had nothing to do with statistical significance. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Next, representing state governments, will be the solicitor general of Texas, Jonathan F. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:35 am by Lyle Denniston
The combined cases the Court heard for about ninety minutes (EPA v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 am by Joan Heminway
 Interestingly, the case cites to a 1992 article written by Larry Mitchell in the Texas Law Review on fiduciary duty law principles. [read post]