Search for: "Mitchell v. State of Washington" Results 141 - 160 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Mitchell, 11-9843 (the habeas case “essentially the same” as Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Justice O'Connor's concurrence in Mitchell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the court’s decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Trump is represented in the Supreme Court by Jonathan Mitchell, the architect of Texas’s controversial six-week abortion ban. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Dayton (William Mitchell), Rebecca Dresser (Washington University), Leslie P. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:46 am by admin
This caveat seems to preserve the Tax Court’s recent opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Washington that prejudice requires a showing that, but for counsel’s error, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
(Christian Shepherd, "Looking to the Future: Xi Shuts the Door on the Past," The Washington Post (7 November 2021)("Only two previous leaders of China have previously  adjudicated on party history: Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's Republic, and Deng Xiaoping, the strongman leader who unleashed market reforms in 1978. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
Mitchell which, among other things, held that Congress could not regulate the voting age in state elections. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm by Jon Sands
  This case was a hard-fought battle by Deputy Federal Public Defenders Gia Kim and Jonathan Aminoff of the Central District of California.]Mitchell v. [read post]