Search for: "Mix v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 12:12 pm
The major difference being that when you screw up a cake, you simply throw it away, whereas when you botch the concrete, you have to rebuild the whole freaking pier.Or worse.Justice Yegan holds that the mistake here was entirely the fault of State Ready Mix, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
K-TEC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:40 am
” – Justice Kenneth Yegan, State Ready Mix, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:49 pm
United States and Rosemond v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:49 pm
United States and Rosemond v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
Vita-Mix loses an appeal to the CAFC:Vita-Mix Corporation (“Vita-Mix”) appeals from the district court’s final judgment in which the court con-cluded that Vita-Mix infringed the asserted claims of two United States patents, K-TEC, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:58 am
State of Arizona v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:58 pm
The case, Harris v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:15 am
Hunting Promissory Estoppel, David V Snyder11. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:57 am
DC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:27 pm
United States, 517 U. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
From Allergan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:26 am
Then follow chapters throwing new light on Commonwealth Caribbean, United States Novojo law, Turkey, South Africa, Sri Lanka, England and Ireland, the European Union, and Public International Law and International Trade Law; all showing that we are entering an era of legal studies involving looking at all legal systems anew. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The post Monday’s Mix appeared first on Slaw. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:16 pm
Employment lawyers across the state are describing Harris v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
In a recent Jones Act case, Sara Herrera v. 7R Charter Limited, No. 19-10605 (11th Cir. 2019), the court makes clear that a seafaring employee need not necessarily forgo the benefits of Jones Act coverage simply because she mixes elements of business with personal pleasure. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 12:33 pm
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled today in Ross v. [read post]
