Search for: "Monroe v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:59 pm
Last week, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a petition for rehearing en banc with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, imploring the court to reconsider a divided panel’s ruling on the unconstitutionality of its administrative law judges in Bandimere v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:26 am
City of Monroe, 17 F.3d 162, 170 (6th Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) (overruling holding of Monroe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
" As the United States Supreme Court commented in Pickering v Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563* “Free and unhindered debate on matters of public importance constitutes a core value of the First Amendment. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
, Monroe County Supreme Court Justice Richard A. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am
We learned that in Monroe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:45 am
On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Foster v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War); Florida Star v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War); Florida Star v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
“The doctrine applies to violations of the United States Constitution and to violation of federal statutes. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:17 am
UNITED STATES [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:41 pm
Monroe Co. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm
But in an homage to the United State Supreme Court, the Court was divided 3-3-1, and so even after reading all the opinions in the case it is not clear what it means for the future.The primary opinion, issue by Chief Judge Lippman, states, "The threshold, and we believe dispositive, issue on these appeals is whether a resentencing sought by a defendant to correct an illegally lenient sentence is effective" to move the date of that prior conviction. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:35 pm
Ganson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Cope v. [read post]
