Search for: "Moore v. Holder" Results 41 - 60 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  The Appellants assert that the House of Lords decision in Stone and Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [1] (in which the liquidators of Stone and Rolls were unable to pursue a claim against the company’s auditors for failure to detect a fraud perpetrated by Stone and Rolls’ sole director and shareholder) applies to the facts in this case thereby preventing Bilta (itself now in liquidation) from making any claim. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:31 am
Moore, now a Circuit Judge on the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm by Florian Mueller
In light of what a Federal Circuit panel--Chief Judge Kimberly Moore and Circuit Judges Timothy Dyk and Raymond Chen--said at a Tuesday hearing in Thales v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:31 am by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta Division) handed down the first federal court ruling on the RLD theory of liability in Moore v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:55 pm
However, as trademark law has drifted from its moorings in the common law of unfair competition and morphed into a property-like right of the holder, the justification for these presumptions should be questioned. [read post]