Search for: "Moore v. United States of America"
Results 141 - 160
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2010, 2:02 am
Yes (Michael Geist) Liberals preparing C-32 amendments on digital locks & fair dealing (Michael Geist) UBC launches license database as Access Copyright Agreement nears expiry (Michael Geist) Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore on how copyright can treat consumers unfairly (Michael Geist) Quebec National Assembly passes motion criticizing C-32 (Michael Geist) Separating copyright facts from fiction ahead of legislative hearings (Michael Geist) China Microsoft win in China over… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Dodd, Victoria J.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2010.Election LawKF4886 .K37 2010Campaign rules : a 50-state guide to campaigns and elections in America / Nina Kasniunas and Daniel M. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
-Israel relations as the Israeli government “has largely dismissed diplomatic efforts by the United States to end the violence in Gaza. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
&& 27-35, on file in State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am
Roosevelt asked the men of the Philippines to fight, promising them United States citizenship and veterans benefits in return. 200,000 fought. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Here’s a bit of history, mostly from my reading of United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
HB4 is extreme anti-immigrant state legislation, and an extraordinary state arrogation of the exclusively federal power to regulate entry to and exit from the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s decision this week in Moore v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
Moore’s belatedly filed declaration states that he believes spinels would produce “better color characteristics” than PET using thermal carbon black, he testified that as of filing date of the ’317 patent, he preferred using carbon black as the best way of making PET to achieve the claimed TCH, absorbance, and luminosity values. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
The Tafas v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Moore v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
This was in response to the United States vs. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
This was in response to the United States vs. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
The Pennsylvania cerebral palsy resource guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Following the United States Supreme Court’s twisted rulings in Baze v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am
In considering this trade-off, it is important to remember that the United States bears full responsibility for the unconscionable delay and continuing legal morass. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Tony Moore, also appears to have believed that Ti818 was the preferred PET resin. [read post]
