Search for: "Morales v. Virginia Employment Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Posted by Justia: Weekly Opinion Summaries – Labor and Employment LawWeekly Summaries Distributed October 3, 2010Solis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
CirØ Important Employment Award Not An Adverse Employment ActionDouglas v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:52 am by Lauren Ellerman
So, what is defamation under Virginia law in the employment / business context? [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For years, many religious conservatives and some liberal proponents of religious accommodations have made common cause to read RFRA broadly and, when that was not sufficient, to argue that the Supreme Court should reverse Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in which the court will decide whether federal employment discrimination law bars discrimination against transgender people based either on their status as transgender or on sex stereotyping, is “not about ‘transgender equality’[; i]t’s about whether businesses and everyday Americans have the right to rely on the law the way it is written. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Nassiri Law
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has posted news of dozens of cases of discrimination based on disability across the country. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
References within the article to California decisions, while not precedential outside that state, nevertheless provide important examples of the types of workplace violence incidents that commissions and boards find compensable. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
Quoting West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Michael Sweig, JD
Berryman, et al, 878 F. 2d 786 (4th Cir. 1989), four dissenting judges in an en banc decision found that the Virginia Employment Commission violated the plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion when it denied her unemployment benefits which she sought because she said it was “the right thing to do” for her to follow her religious conviction, and therefore, quit her job to follow her husband’s move 150 miles away from her… [read post]
By arguing that Title VII permits employers to discriminate against employees because they love or enter sexual relationships with people of the same sex, the Department of Justice broke with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the attorneys general of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont, and dozens of major corporations.As we argue, here, the DOJ’s position in Zarda is not only morally repugnant but also analytically weak. [read post]