Search for: "Morrison v. Board of Law Examiners" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2006, 11:14 am
Board of Law Examiners, No. 05-1257 (4th Cir. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 10:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
However, a recent Ohio federal district court decision in an opioid-related derivative suit against the board of the pharmaceutical distribution firm Cardinal Health examined issues addressed sufficiency of breach the duty of oversight allegations under Ohio law. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:34 am by James Hamilton
The Supreme Court effectively replaced the conduct and effects test with a transactional test and imposed a bright line rule on the cross-border availability of Rule 10b-5.In Morrison v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Amended Regulation defines the Senior Governing Body as the board of directors (or an appropriate committee thereof) or equivalent governing body or, if neither of those exist, the senior officer or officers of a covered entity responsible for that entity’s cybersecurity program.[35] The Senior Governing Body of the covered entity is required to exercise oversight of the covered entity’s cybersecurity risk management, including by: (i) having su [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:09 am by Unknown
Garvey sought review by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), whose adverse decision was then reviewed by the DOL Administrative Review Board (“Board”). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
  We have examined the application of notions of rule of law not just to understand the limits of government's power (under law) to deprive individuals of their life, liberty or property interests, but also how law has been used as structural constraints on politics. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
”  Briefly: Steven Davidoff of the New York Times discusses new questions raised by Morrison v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:34 am by Katherine Pompilio
West, Brookings senior fellow; Isabel V. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 7:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The law firms on the losing side included Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, and Morrison & Foerster LLP. [read post]