Search for: "Moses v. Moses" Results 1 - 20 of 597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
 For example, if an individual litigant is seeking a declaration that certain agency practices are unconstitutional in proceedings they are involved in, which would have an effect of finding say that an agency's ALJs are unlawfully appointed or insulated from presidential control (such as in Jarkesy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
The FBI used a strategy of Analyze, Compare, Evaluate—Verify (ACE-V). [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm by Tobias Lutzi
By Moses Wiepen, Legal Trainee at the Higher Regional Court of Hamm, Germany In its decision of 21 July 2023 (V ZR 112/22), the German Federal Court of Justice confirmed that Art. 26 Brussels Ia Regulation applies regardless of the defendant’s domicile. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation  to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 3:39 am by Eleonora Rosati
However, since the legal meaning of a pastiche had to be clarified by interpreting Union law, the OLG allowed an appeal to the BGH (only regarding the time after June 7, 2021)With its Metall auf Metall V decision, the BGH once more staid the proceedings to ask the CJEU for guidance. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
As for divorce – Jesus (in what is sometimes referred to as the Matthaean exception which is to be compared with his statements about divorce in Mark and Luke which allowed no exception) said that Moses suffered divorce, i.e. allowed it, as a present custom which he regulated – allowing it for uncleanness/unfaithfulness. [read post]