Search for: "Motion for Amendment of Primary Order" Results 1 - 20 of 1,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 3:58 pm by Donna Bader
 The primary question in such motions was whether it completely disposed of a cause of action, affirmative defense, or issue of duty. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:50 am by Eric Schweibenz
According to Order 36, a group of respondents filed a motion seeking leave to amend their Notice of Prior Art to add 19 additional references. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:49 am
The plaintiffs filed their Fourth Amended Complaint and thereafter the defendants renewed their motions to dismiss. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:05 pm by Scott McKeown
  But, in an Order last week (here) the Board has denied the request, explaining: As the active Petitioner, it is [] within ZTE’s purview to determine whether to oppose CyWee’s Revised Motion to Amend. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 8:30 pm
Carter of the Central District of California issued an order granting in part Hyundai’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Allegations in First Amended Complaint in Glenn, et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:10 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
§ 49.49(1)(a)3. (2005-06), and from an order denying several postconviction motions. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 7:51 am by Florian Mueller
Chen (Northern District of California) publicly known, but the actual document is sealed for the time being:(UNDER SEAL) ORDER granting [111], [114] Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:47 pm by Lawrence Solum
There were more orders granting dismissal with and without leave to amend, and for every case category examined. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 8:40 am by Liskow & Lewis
By Kelly Becker Federal Judge Ginger Berrigan issued a comprehensive Order and Reasons addressing and granting a series of motions to dismiss filed by oil and gas company defendants, and individual executive officer defendants, all of which were pending in the consolidated federal court Bonvillain Terrebonne Parish ad valorem tax suits. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am by Jeff Welty
” All the primary sponsors of both bills are Democrats. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s ruling explaining that “Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court either should have dismissed the petition upon the [Board’s] motion, pursuant to the doctrine of primary jurisdiction or, upon the Commissioner's determination of the administrative appeal, should have permitted Marsico to amend her petition so as to seek review of the Commissioner's determination and to… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s ruling explaining that “Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court either should have dismissed the petition upon the [Board’s] motion, pursuant to the doctrine of primary jurisdiction or, upon the Commissioner's determination of the administrative appeal, should have permitted Marsico to amend her petition so as to seek review of the Commissioner's determination and to… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:40 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum
Under the scheduling order entered by the court, the Bureau must file by October 23 its combined cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to the plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
Father affixed a paternity test to his motion to alter or amend the prior dismissal and established that he had attempted to petition the Court "to enter an agreed order of paternity" on an earlier date. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 9:21 am
  It appears that the orders granting conditional judgment and denying Galaxy's motion to reargue/renew were not appealed. [read post]