Search for: "Motley v. Motley"
Results 81 - 100
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 6:35 pm
This is somehat different from the approach taken in Totalise v Motley Fool concerning whether an ISP should pay for its costs if opposing a Norwich Pharmacal order, and it is, in my view, the wrong decision. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:16 am
This time last year I blogged about Bonnier Audio v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:42 pm
v=HIO8nI2C8Z8 She’ll Sing For You, part 1 © 2011 by the authors of Popehat. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 7:27 pm
See, e.g., Anderson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:06 am
The UK Intellectual Property Office's alerting service has informed the IPKat of the case brought by Spain before the Court of Justice: Case C-274/11 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:54 pm
In the early eighteenth century, a second set of users filled up these blank versos with a motley assortment of entries, including the sea shanty transcribed above (v. 21). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
The clue here is in para 189 where Arnold J warns helpfully thatFurthermore, although I cannot prejudge later arguments in this case, it is not inevitable that future applicants will recover all their costs even if successful: compare the practice in respect of Norwich Pharmacal orders, as to which see Totalise plc v Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
The Plaintiffs were a motley crew of doctors, patients, scientific organizations and advocacy groups. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
The Plaintiffs were a motley crew of doctors, patients, scientific organizations and advocacy groups. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Smilowitz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:44 am
Eleventh Amendment immunity of a public entityAguilar v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm
Building on the Eleventh Circuit’s landmark decision in McClain v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am
Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, Robert Carter, Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, and others litigated all around the country in their efforts to take down Plessy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
He argued Buck v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:27 pm
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: Motley v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:05 am
We're content with that post stating all the many policy and practical reasons why such consolidations are prejudicial to the defense of cases (which is why plaintiffs seek them and some courts allow them), difficult for jurors to make sense of, and otherwise a bad idea.In that vein we applaud the decision in Johnson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:52 pm
" The Rhode Island Supreme Court unanimously ruled against him in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:04 pm
By Daniel RichardsonZorn v. [read post]
