Search for: "Motown Records"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2006, 7:02 am
We have just learned of a pro se litigant in Alabama defeating the RIAA's summary judgment motion:November 9, 2006, Decision Denying Summary Judgment in Motown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
John Doe Assigned to: Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement Filed: March 27, 2008 Motown Record Company, L.P. et al v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 7:04 pm
"ABCeasy as 1-23simple as do-ri-me-ABC-123-list your victim as an A and you will A-OK"(c) Rumpole and Motown Records, 2014. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:10 pm
Living Will Registry, is a service that keeps a detailed computer record of wills, powers of attorney and so forth and is easily searchable at the time of death. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
His attorney, Curtis Shaw, hit upon an idea: Motown, Marvin’s record label, had given him $305,000 as an advance for his upcoming-but-undeveloped album. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
His attorney, Curtis Shaw, hit upon an idea: Motown, Marvin’s record label, had given him $305,000 as an advance for his upcoming-but-undeveloped album. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:01 am
He wanted us to check out this deconstructed version of the Rolling Stones' recording of the song "Gimme Shelter. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
Under the district court’s holding, one could start a competing record label today called Motown, Sony, Universal or Def Jam, and so long as they could provide any artistic reason for the name, they would be protected under the First Amendment, regardless of the amount of consumer confusion. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
Under the district court’s holding, one could start a competing record label today called Motown, Sony, Universal or Def Jam, and so long as they could provide any artistic reason for the name, they would be protected under the First Amendment, regardless of the amount of consumer confusion. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:53 am
Busch complained that King was trying to confuse the jury by repeatedly declaring that the sound recording of 'Got To Give It Up' is owned by the Motown label and not the Gaye family. [read post]
18 May 2019, 1:09 am
The Shirelles are often credited as the first of the crossover "girl groups," predating the Motown sound. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:50 pm
I am a big fan of “Motor City” … or, “Motown” … once the global center of the automotive industry.There you’ll find some of the world’s finest cultural institutions, including The Henry Ford Museum, The Charles H. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:49 pm
Sad.Anyway, for all the great records of '72, it's the 50th anniversary now. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:41 am
In Arista Records, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:33 am
" Fueled by Ramen has its acts promote one another as well as the company itself, as indie labels have done since the 1960s heyday of Motown and Stax. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:35 am
Iconic Motown recording artists The Temptations are the latest in a string of artists to end up in court over the terms of their royalty contracts following a 2010 decision in favor of rapper Eminem in a similar case. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 6:06 am
Motown on Broadway. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:12 am
Mattel, Inc., Opposition No. 91176791 [Section 2(d) opposition to MOTOWN METAL for toy vehicles based upon the registered mark MOTOWN MUSIC REVIEW for "retail gift store featuring music, clothing, reading materials and souvenirs"].November 18, 2010 - 2 PM: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:22 am
Mattel, Inc., Opposition No. 91176791 [Section 2(d) opposition to MOTOWN METAL for toy vehicles based upon the registered mark MOTOWN MUSIC REVIEW for "retail gift store featuring music, clothing, reading materials and souvenirs"].January 27, 2011 - 11 AM: In re The North Face Apparel Corp., Serial No. 77363321 [Refusal to register the mark shown below, consisting of "the placement of an irregularly shaped logo containing a flat horizontal line curving downward from… [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
That section expressly vests “exclusive ownership” of any pre-2/15/72 recording in the recording’s copyright owner. [read post]
