Search for: "Movant's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause"
Results 121 - 140
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Finally, Transocean presented evidence that the success of its invention caused others to copy it, including Maersk USA. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:01 pm
On summary judgment, we must draw all justifiable inferences in favor of the non-movant, Transocean. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Does 1-9 (Denver, CO)Ex Parte Order dated April 4, 2007 (Granting Ex Parte Order, But Declining to Rule that Court Order is Unnecessary)*Arista v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:19 am
I don't know why the court didn't issue the show-cause order required by Rule 11(c)(3). [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
The district courts found that the government consciously disregarded the limitations set forth in the search warrants and ordered the return of the property. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Order on Motion to Show Cause at 40. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:19 pm
The content of the depositions is not available for this Court to review, nor was it available for the trial court to review in the Real Party in Interest's response in opposition to Defendant's motion to reconsider compelling arbitration. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:20 am
The 60-day coding will also cause MSP to upload the mortgage payment data, including the note, mortgage and assignments (if any) and any other necessary documents for the filing, into NewTrak to be retrieved by local counsel. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:23 pm
C1777aAppeals -- Federal -- Jurisdiction -- Order remanding case to state court from which it was removed -- Federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review district court's order remanding case to state court after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c) -- Such order is not a remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction for which appellate review is barred by… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:47 am
The court decides that in order to obtain a new trial on that basis, the movant has to show that an accurate response would have provided a basis for challenging the juror for cause. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Action: In response to Goldberg's motion, the trial court ordered the grantor-father and his physician to appear in court for a hearing on the grantor-father's medical condition. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
claims for relief unless Athe motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the movant is entitled to no relief.@ Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851(f)(5)(B) applies the same standard to successive postconviction motions in capital cases. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
In response, defendant Officer Martin drove to the scene. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Order, at 9. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Order, at 9. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
"Rather, the court is to evaluate each motion on its merits, resolving factual uncertainties and drawing all reasonable inferences against the movant. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:34 am
Mitan did not file a timely response. . . . [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
OPINION AND ORDER SARGUS, J. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:12 am
But if that's not the case, then showing weaknesses may cause the litigation to drag on. [read post]
