Search for: "Mueller v. People's Counsel"
Results 1 - 20
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm
President Trump was not one of those people. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
First, Mueller has not been confirmed by the Senate and, second, Congress has not delegated to the Attorney General the power to create inferior offices or to appoint people to those offices. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
Mueller “to serve as a Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:09 pm
As our organization, United to Protect Democracy, pointed out in this memo, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm
” More recently, in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Circuit in a different case, McKeever v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm
President Trump and his defenders have sought to undermine the legitimacy of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation at every turn. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
As Marty Lederman has explained, “The fact that many people came to see the Independent Counsel Act as a bad idea—including for some of the reasons described by Justice Scalia in his lone Morrison dissent—does not mean that they think it was unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:07 am
But they will be all the more explosive in a case like Mueller v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm
Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
As Philip Lacovara, who served as counsel to Jaworski and argued U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:53 am
People are saying Mueller's team broke the law and violated rights. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Special Counsel Robert Mueller held a press conference this week to wrap up his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and to clarify his position on whether the President obstructed justice. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Under section 6(e) of the FRCP, certain people involved in a grand jury proceeding “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury,” including the grand jurors themselves, the government attorney presenting the case to the grand jury, the court reporter and other technical people involved in the proceeding itself. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Examples of such episodes include the President’s efforts to (1) fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, (2) curtail Mueller’s investigation, and (3) order White House Counsel Don McGahn to deny that the President had previously ordered McGahn to fire Mueller. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:27 pm
The Court in Morrison v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Mueller actually needs to be persuasive to people like Goldsmith on a matter as fundamental as the application of the obstruction statutes to presidential action. [read post]
