Search for: "Muniz v. UPS" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am by John Floyd
Muniz: Police can question and videotape a D.U.I. suspect without giving Miranda warnings. 2010 Berghuis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am by Philip Mousavizadeh
Luana Muniz and Zoya Sheftalovich report for POLITICO. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
” Second, law enforcement must explain to the suspect the consequence of giving up his privilege to remain silence. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am by David Post
Thus, 6th Amendment protections do not apply to: proceedings involving "petty" (as opposed to "serious") crimes, as measured by the length of the authorized prison term, Muniz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable            In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
José Antonio Muniz Lopes (Lopes) was a member of the company’s board and CEO through February 25, 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It pointed out that the alimony covered by the first agreement did not add up to $45,000. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
The topic of celebrity social media endorsements has received heightened scrutiny in recent months, when even D-list celebrities and reality TV personalities are being paid to utilize their fame in 140 characters or less; “Jersey Shore” star Snooki, for example, commands up to $7,900 per tweet, while faded “Malcolm in the Middle” actor Frankie Muniz pays a few bills at $232 a tweet.11 Some of that scrutiny is coming from the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]