Search for: "Mustafa v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2014, 4:49 pm
He also says that the Supreme Court’s joint trial jurisprudence in Zafiro v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 2:00 am
Tomorrow morning, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Harris v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
., Lartigue v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
She previewed oral arguments in Al Janko v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
Today defense counsel to Mustafa al Hawsawi in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
The military judge ascends and calls United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:54 am
CRUMPTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
Walter Ruiz, a lawyer for 9/11 accused Mustafa al-Hawsawi, said this in a statement released earlier today: The judge ruled that the defense request is reasonable on its face and that the interests of justice are served by granting a continuance and those interests outweigh the best interests of the public and the accused in a prompt trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:13 am
As discussed this morning, she may yet wind up representing Mustafa al-Hawsawi, but doesn’t represent him just yet. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:55 am
United States, which is currently pending appeal. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
In Ozgul v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
The standard for removal and subsequent trial in absentia in both federal and U.S. military courts is Illinois v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:06 pm
In Rehmani v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
Today the Chamber judgment of the ECHR came down in the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
Ohio and NAACP v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
DoD Press Release, here, announces: The Department of Defense announced today that the convening authority, Office of Military Commissions, referred charges to a military commission in the case of “United States v. [read post]
