Search for: "NASH v FRANK" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2009, 3:32 am
Three of his dozen or so copyright opinions turn up repeatedly in copyright casebooks: Nash v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
The Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of Bassett v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm by Matthew Davie
Broadly, the purpose of section 35 is to promote free and frank communications between the government and its advisors. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Metro Govt Nash    Middle District of Tennessee at NashvilleRONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:50 pm by Jean O'Grady
Shenkman, Senior Manager, KM Counsel & Research, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Patrick V. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
So well done Frank Industries, owner of a registration for LDNR – a women’s activewear brand – for taking on Nike over its use of the same mark in a high profile advertising campaign. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 1:55 am
Since the finding of liability exceeded 50%, under New York law they are liable to pay all of the non-economic damages.The decision by the Appellate Division First Department in Nash v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm by fjhinojosa
Kastenberg, The Limits of Executive Power in Crisis in the Early Republic: Martin v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Cary Coglianese (University of Pennsylvania Law School) & Jennifer Nash (Harvard University’s John F. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am by Kevin
Primeau seems completely frank” about what happened, and “there is clearly a part of the story that escapes the Tribunal. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]