Search for: "NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
HollyFrontier argues that the EPA should be allowed deferential treatment in interpreting legislation as established in Chevron USA Inc. v Natural Resource Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Smith Distributing Company, Inc. entered into an agreement with the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
On July 9, 2010, Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”), on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) filed a complaint in this matter pursuant to CERCLA Section 107, 42 U.S.C. 9607, seeking recovery of environmental response costs incurred by EPA related to the release or threatened release or disposal of hazardous substances at or from the Site. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority); application of CEQA to council enactment of measures which qualify as initiatives on local ballots (Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency, Albaugh Inc. of Ankeny will pay $27,360 for violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Tom Merrill
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842 (1984), and the only judgment before the Court was the one overturning the Trump Administration ACE plan. [read post]
Brief for Natural Resources Defense Council as amici curiae supporting respondent, Monsanto v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by WIMS
United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm by WIMS
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) issued a release calling the decision "a landmark ruling," that "five large electric power companies can be sued in Federal court because their carbon dioxide emissions contribute to rising temperatures and a host of damaging impacts in other states, including heat waves, smog episodes, droughts and forest fires. [read post]
Plaintiff Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC, a landowner at the time of reversion, challenged the reversion’s legality and constitutionality in a state agency appeal, later filing suit in federal district court. [read post]
Plaintiff Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC, a landowner at the time of reversion, challenged the reversion’s legality and constitutionality in a state agency appeal, later filing suit in federal district court. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm by WIMS
      The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and Riverkeeper issued a release saying, "The proposed rule, released this evening (March 28), was supposed to modernize the way power plants take in and release water used for cooling. [read post]
Plaintiff Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC, a landowner at the time of reversion, challenged the reversion’s legality and constitutionality in a state agency appeal, later filing suit in federal district court. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc., courts have deferred to agencies’ reasonable interpretation of statutes. [read post]