Search for: "NOBLE v. PAGE" Results 61 - 80 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Peter Groves
This kind of addition is of course typical of Bernstein who would often be far more interested in the spirit of the written score rather than the literal instructions on the page. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:09 am by Aaron Rubin and Anelia V. Delcheva
In contrast, Barnes & Noble had less luck enforcing its terms of use in Nguyen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
The IPKat notched up its 16 millionth page view. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:29 am by Aaron Rubin and Daniel A. Zlatnik
Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble did include a relatively clear link to its website terms on its checkout page, but nothing required users to affirmatively indicate that they accepted the terms. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 1:56 pm by Spencer Persson and Shirley Kim (US)
Barnes & Noble Inc., 763 F.3d 1171, 1178 (9th Cir. 2014). [3] Id.; see, e.g., Zaltz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Datonomy blog has a Cyber Update for the week commencing 6 July 2015 Statements in Open Court and Apologies There were statement in open court in the cases of Ben Jackson v MGN [pdf],  Bobbie Holland Hanton and Emma Noble v MGN, read on 8 July 2015 before Mann J. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Highlights of the Platinum Jubilee Celebrations… … included not referring to Platty Jubes, not coming in early on the Vivats in I Was Glad (unlike at its first performance at the 1902 Coronation), not reading through the 133 pages of instructions on the construction and use of Jubilee beacons and, for some, singing Long live our noble Duke as the second line of the Lancashire version of the… [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
The Supreme Court, in a 12-page decision by Justice Carolyn Berger, made short work of Blaustein’s two theories. [read post]