Search for: "NYQUIST v NYQUIST" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Reinstatement following layoff focuses on tenure rights Chauvel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:35 am
Reinstatement following layoff focuses on tenure rightsChauvel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
Andrews): "'Impounded as a Stray': The English Legal Imaginary of Scotland in Henry V" Daniel Hulsebosch (Law, NYU): "Floors, Mirrors, and Ceilings in the Legal Architecture of Empire"Concluding RemarksModerators: Bradin Cormack and Lorna HutsonH/t: Michelle McKinley [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*Thus, explained the court, "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it" and dismissed Petitioner’s action.* See, for example: Fowler v City of Saratoga Springs, 215 A.D.2d 819 (City Engineer lawfully dismissed for failure to obtain Professional Engineer’s license by a specified date); Meliti v Nyquist, 53 AD2d 951, affirmed 41… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:09 am
"Thus, where, as here, several charges have been dismissed on appeal, an appellate court will often remit the matter for an appropriate penalty (id.; see also, Matter of Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182, 186). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, in Meliti v Nyquist, 41 NY2d 183, the Court of Appeals held that the suspension of a teacher without pay was appropriate where the teacher lacked the necessary license or certification to teach. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:08 am
Other examples include Meliti v Nyquist, 53 AD2d 951, affirmed 41 NY2d 183 (immediate suspension of teachers was lawful because their teaching licenses had expired) and O’Keefe v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp, 714 FSupp 622, (traveling company demonstrator was not discriminated against when a private sector employer terminated the individual after his driver’s license was suspended). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
For example, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, 539 NY2d 83, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquist, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated Section 2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority for the purposes of layoff. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 10:49 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Pipeline Contractors, Inc., 266 So. 3d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (defining consequential damages); Nyquist v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:01 am
Suspension without payElmore v Mills, App. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Here is part of the argument in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:04 am
In such situations the courts have upheld the employee's immediate suspension without pay, i.e., suspension without pay is proper where the individual lacks the necessary license or certification authorized [see Meliti v Nyquist, 41 NY2d 183]. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In such situations the courts have upheld the employer summarily suspending the employee without pay as was the case in Meliti v Nyquist, 41 NY2d 183.The legal theory in such cases is that it would be unlawful to continue a tenured but uncertified, and therefore unqualified, teacher on the payroll. [read post]