Search for: "Nash v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm by Zachary Spilman
Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
And yes, the "Nash" in Bernoulli-Nash is John Nash of "A Beautiful Mind" and Nobel-prize fame. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (and 11-5721 – Hill v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rejected the agents’ argument. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Conor McEvily
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
  Two of those, Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new cases are Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
DeverAmicus brief of Thomas More Law CenterAmicus brief of Justice and Freedom FundAmicus brief of Arizona State LegislaturePetitioner's reply Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm by David
United States (jurisdiction) on August 29 , Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:15 am by Marissa Miller
The petitions of the day are: Title: Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:52 am by Marie Louise
(Spicy IP)   Russia Judge: Pirate Party name-ban decision stands (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom EWCA (Civ): Clippings services users must have licence or infringe newspapers’ copyright: The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd & Others v Meltwater Holding BV & Others (Out-Law.com) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (IPKat) EWHC forces BT to block links to pirate site: Twentieth Century Fox & Ors v British Telecommunications (Out-Law) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:49 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to audio of NMCCA’s 26 May oral argument in United States v. [read post]